Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:35

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
‘I think Xbox hardware is dead’, says Microsoft gaming veteran - Video Games Chronicle
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
The Tyrese Haliburton Conundrum - The Ringer
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scientists Just Discovered a Lost Ancient Culture That Vanished - 404 Media
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
2025 NBA Finals: 4 things to watch for in Game 7 of Finals - NBA
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Nintendo showcases Wave Race-style mission in Mario Kart World - My Nintendo News
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How can someone get patrons on Patreon if they are a beginner artist?